From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.5-pre1 (2020-06-20) on
	ip-172-31-74-118.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_20,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.5-pre1
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7c99:: with SMTP id y25mr12917123qtv.239.1623606089228; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 10:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:58e:: with SMTP id l14mr20415718ybp.303.1623606089062; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 10:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Path: eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder1.feed.usenet.farm!feed.usenet.farm!tr1.eu1.usenetexpress.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com!tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news-out.google.com!nntp.google.com!postnews.google.com!google-groups.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 10:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <iikb6gFrhljU1@mid.individual.net>
Injection-Info: google-groups.googlegroups.com; posting-host=94.31.98.170; posting-account=rmHyLAoAAADSQmMWJF0a_815Fdd96RDf
NNTP-Posting-Host: 94.31.98.170
References: <c6169572-25bc-4db7-a50d-c6c8575069a4n@googlegroups.com> <sa2bpc$it8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <aa8d1e4f-494e-4d8a-8c44-edfdb7f3ec04n@googlegroups.com> <4db69f85-a3b3-48f8-a41e-8bdf196a8294n@googlegroups.com> <iikb6gFrhljU1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <be4d34dc-d899-4341-ab63-0ddb44b97cefn@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: non-preemptive tasking on GNAT 2020 Windows 10 multicore AMD
From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 17:41:29 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:62220
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Niklas Holsti schrieb am Samstag, 12. Juni 2021 um 20:02:58 UTC+2:
> I haven't found any connection between dispatching points and updates to 
> globals in RM Annex D, where dispatching points are defined.
> > So taks One could infact consider Y constant within the loop.

Hm, you're right, I cannot find such a statement in the post-Ada83 RM.

Ada 83 ,9.11, has it. These points are called sychronization points.

I learned Ada in the 80s - old memories stick.