From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.42.51.141 with SMTP id e13mr29285542icg.28.1388675167994;
 Thu, 02 Jan 2014 07:06:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.49.58.129 with SMTP id r1mr9691qeq.31.1388675167957; Thu, 02
 Jan 2014 07:06:07 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog3.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!fu10no6107949igb.0!news-out.google.com!p7ni1129qat.0!nntp.google.com!p15no55670434qaj.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 07:06:07 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <85mwk4wwru.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2001:690:2200:9aa1:596b:392a:57d5:6b1a;
 posting-account=3cDqWgoAAAAZXc8D3pDqwa77IryJ2nnY
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2001:690:2200:9aa1:596b:392a:57d5:6b1a
References: <52a0de7e$0$23162$2c885b36@post.eweka.nl>
 <85vbyz15b0.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
 <85efaf99-c2f5-419e-afaa-e0df918e0ec5@googlegroups.com>
 <85mwk4wwru.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <be3eaea3-dad8-428a-ae45-91c97ef4832c@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Exclude parts of a package
From: Marius Amado-Alves <amado.alves@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 15:06:07 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Original-Bytes: 1977
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:184331
Date: 2014-01-02T07:06:07-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, 13 December 2013 16:17:25 UTC, Stephen Leake  wrote:
> Marius Amado-Alves <amado.alves@gmail.com> writes:
> >> When you fix a bug in version 1.0, propagate the changes to 1.1 ...
> > Somehow I find this strange. Potential regressive effects in 1.1
> > Usually the bugs are fixed in the last version. What am I missing? Any
> > pointers, maybe to literature, appreciated.
> You stated that you want to distribute multiple versions of a package,...

I did not state that, but no worries. I understand now what was meant with "When you fix a bug in version 1.0, propagate the changes to 1.1", thanks.