From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a02:9b1c:: with SMTP id o28mr22501710jak.10.1550723265186;
        Wed, 20 Feb 2019 20:27:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:da3:: with SMTP id 32mr458772ots.3.1550723265015; Wed,
 20 Feb 2019 20:27:45 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!y42no140194ita.0!news-out.google.com!d79ni89itc.0!nntp.google.com!y22no140159ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 20:27:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <q4kov7$40n$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5
References: <f0886b90-11b5-48b5-8a9e-da9ad33a2a65@googlegroups.com>
 <54a5873a-57aa-40c6-8af4-a6f908d53593@googlegroups.com>
 <b773bbfa-9fd0-431a-8ff3-462b2c5ccd15@googlegroups.com>
 <q4kov7$40n$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <be2e3cf3-e452-4501-a960-822bf6432cd9@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Ada 202x and square brackets
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2019 04:27:45 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Xref: reader01.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:55618
Date: 2019-02-20T20:27:44-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wednesday, 20 February 2019 23:47:53 UTC, Randy Brukardt  wrote:

>              My_Arr : constant Some_Unconstrained_Array_Type := [1];
> 
> Container aggregates are roughly user-defined array aggrgeates. 
> (Alternatively, you can [maybe should] think of an array as a built-in 
> container.)

Do you think the language is getting a tad too complicated now?