From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,887e9a80ba7c6caf X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-28 00:51:17 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!213.200.246.247!not-for-mail From: Vinzent Hoefler Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Grace.Config_Files comment syntax Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 09:49:33 +0200 Organization: JeLlyFish software Message-ID: References: Reply-To: v.hoefler@acm.org NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.200.246.247 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1056786675 31370323 213.200.246.247 (16 [175126]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39864 Date: 2003-06-28T09:49:33+02:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake wrote: >Vinzent Hoefler writes: > >> Don't forget the "--" comment. :-) > >Hmm. I see the smiley, Yes. It wasn't meant to be *really* serious. >but seriously, if we are following the Java >Properties file format, we can't add a new comment syntax. What a pity... >Are you seriously suggesting that we should add a new comment syntax? Well, if we'd do, would it break something? If the goal is to keep 100% compatibility in both directions, we can't do that, sure. Vinzent.