From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,af3dada69080e420 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-25 23:29:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!213.200.246.247!not-for-mail From: Vinzent Hoefler Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Interesting effects in array renaming Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 08:27:47 +0200 Organization: JeLlyFish software Message-ID: References: <3EF5E6B8.3030203@spam.com> <3EF7B8CC.3000100@attbi.com> Reply-To: v.hoefler@acm.org NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.200.246.247 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1056608966 29360902 213.200.246.247 (16 [175126]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39761 Date: 2003-06-26T08:27:47+02:00 List-Id: Randy Brukardt wrote: >But there are a number of things about Ada that are wrong (the inability >to use "in out" parameters on functions is the most obvious to me), In fact the idea that a function shall have no (or at least very limited) side effects is a quite good one. Well, you still can use global variables or access-Parameters to circumvent this restriction, so perhaps one can consider it as rather inconsequential, but wrong? No, I don't think so. Vinzent.