From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.200.8.239 with SMTP id y44mr26274671qth.42.1509309165202; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 13:32:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.52.218 with SMTP id t26mr624631otd.10.1509309165171; Sun, 29 Oct 2017 13:32:45 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.fcku.it!peer02.fr7!futter-mich.highwinds-media.com!peer01.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!z50no5025229qtj.0!news-out.google.com!r5ni5195qtc.1!nntp.google.com!k31no5040366qta.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 13:32:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2601:18f:900:f900:890b:5da7:fc3a:7d41; posting-account=3pYsyQoAAACcI-ym7XtMOI2PDU8gRZS5 NNTP-Posting-Host: 2601:18f:900:f900:890b:5da7:fc3a:7d41 References: <454a2aa4-89a6-4495-96cd-2e73df93f135@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is there any other forum for Ada? From: Andrew Shvets Injection-Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 20:32:45 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Body-CRC: 1747092114 X-Received-Bytes: 3346 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48642 Date: 2017-10-29T13:32:44-07:00 List-Id: On Sunday, October 29, 2017 at 4:26:28 PM UTC-4, Niklas Holsti wrote: > On 17-10-29 21:42 , tcl......@gmail.com wrote: > > Hi > > > > I googled, and this is the only Ada forum that I found > > Is there any other active forum > > Answers to some of your questions can be found on the Ada Information > Clearinghouse website, www.adaic.org. > > > I still would like to learn more about its commercial license > ... > > Should I really worry about Adacore and the commercial licensing cost? > > You should contact AdaCore, explain your needs, even if still > hypothetical, and get an offer. > > But note that (a) there are other commercially available Ada compilers, > some quite inexpensive; (b) there is a free version of GNAT from the > Free Software Foundation that is not limited to GPL SW, and is part of > several Linux distributions, as well as available on MS Windows; and (c) > there is a version of GNAT from AdaCore that is free but limited to GPL > SW (GNAT GPL). > > > I would also like to ask about general stuff, like > > is there a roadmap for Ada, > > Yes, to some extent. But compatibility and continuity are considered > important for Ada, so there are limits on the kind of changes that can > be made, and still call the result "Ada". > > > is there plans for Ada2020 for example, > > Yes. > > >what are the new features planned for newer Ada releases? > > Subscribe to the ada-comment mailing list > (http://www.adaic.org/2017/08/community-input-for-ada/) and browse the > "Ada Issues" database (http://www.ada-auth.org/ais.html). > > > Anyway, is there a forum where I cant discuss these things without feeling guilty > > I, at least, would welcome discussion of these issues here. > > -- > Niklas Holsti > Tidorum Ltd > niklas holsti tidorum fi > . @ . I've seen all sorts of questions being asked on this mailing list. From the very simple to some very complex topics. I see no reason why he can't ask his questions here.