From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,38fc011071df5a27
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-21 05:37:03 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.airnews.net!cabal12.airnews.net!usenet
From: "John R. Strohm" <strohm@airmail.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ideas for Ada 200X
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 07:20:57 -0500
Organization: Airnews.net! at Internet America
Message-ID: <bd1jeq$scb@library1.airnews.net>
References: <uhe6zw201.fsf@nasa.gov> <3EECA772.4B662024@adaworks.com>
 <hYmHa.6881$Hb.124073@news4.e.nsc.no>
 <BB13C10D.350A%yaldnifw@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <bcl1pu$jscm4$1@ID-175126.news.dfncis.de>
 <BB13CDB9.3516%yaldnifw@blueyonder.co.uk>
 <e2e5731a.0306180700.61b2575f@posting.google.com>
 <5115eb96.0306181631.1d70482b@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbf3arb.hi.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <5115eb96.0306191808.155c4a05@posting.google.com>
 <slrnbf5eau.hp.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39523
Date: 2003-06-21T07:20:57-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

X-A-Notice: References line has been trimed due to 512 byte limitation
Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at airmail.net to report improper postings
NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library1-aux.airnews.net
NNTP-Posting-Time: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 07:35:39 -0500 (CDT)
NNTP-Posting-Host: !ca,D1k-VQZ1^99 (Encoded at Airnews!)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

"Preben Randhol" <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote in message
news:slrnbf5eau.hp.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no...
> Amir Yantimirov wrote:
> >
> >   X# + A;         --  X := X + A;
> >   min ( X#, 0 );  --  X := min ( X, 0 );
> >   X# + # * 2;     --  X := X + X * 2; (it should be **2 to have sense)
> >   X#.Next;        --  X := X.Next;
>
> OK, then I would vote a big fat NO to this as it is totally unreable and
> is probably something you could find in Perl or sth similar :-)

Second the motion.