From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,df40d0d1975a16a6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-13 08:35:54 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!213.200.246.247!not-for-mail
From: Vinzent Hoefler <ada.rocks@jlfencey.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Optimizing Boundary Checks
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 17:34:22 +0200
Organization: JeLlyFish software
Message-ID: <bccr0n$hqji5$1@ID-175126.news.dfncis.de>
References: <slrnbejegn.in.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <20030613140324.0000372e._elh_@_terma_._com_>
 <slrnbejhll.in.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <slrnbeji0e.in.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bccjju$hs492$2@ID-175126.news.dfncis.de>
 <slrnbejlup.5eu.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bccnuv$i5af3$1@ID-175126.news.dfncis.de>
 <slrnbejr5q.a71.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.200.246.247
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1055518552 18697797 213.200.246.247 (16 [175126])
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39129
Date: 2003-06-13T17:34:22+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Preben Randhol wrote:

>Vinzent Hoefler wrote:
>>=20
>> I guess, you are refering to
>><slrnbdpdan.87p.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>?
>
>No to:
>
><mailman.1.1054650999.19078.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>

Yes, of course, I meant that. The posting I mentioned was your answer
to this. The classical off-by-one error, I'd say. ;-)


Vinzent.