From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,df40d0d1975a16a6
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-13 06:29:36 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!syros.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!feed.news.nacamar.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!213.200.246.247!not-for-mail
From: Vinzent Hoefler <ada.rocks@jlfencey.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Optimizing Boundary Checks
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 15:28:06 +0200
Organization: JeLlyFish software
Message-ID: <bccjju$hs492$2@ID-175126.news.dfncis.de>
References: <slrnbejegn.in.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <20030613140324.0000372e._elh_@_terma_._com_>
 <slrnbejhll.in.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <slrnbeji0e.in.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.200.246.247
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1055510975 18747682 213.200.246.247 (16 [175126])
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39107
Date: 2003-06-13T15:28:06+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Preben Randhol wrote:

>Reason for asking is that I get:
>
>t.adb:10:11: warning: value not in range of subtype of =
"Standard.integer" defined at line 6
>t.adb:10:11: warning: "constraint_error" will be raised at run time
>
>if I do:
>
>   type Items is array (1 .. 10) of Natural;
>   Boxes : Items;
>
>begin
>  =20
>   Boxes(11) :=3D 1;

Well, yes. It can be determined at the time the code is compiled,
because

|1 < 11 or 11 > 10

simply results in True here, because everything is constant. Here the
compiler even is allowed to not do anything at all with the array,
instead it is enough to just generate the call to the exception
handler.

But if you'd like to try

|i : Integer;
| ...
|i :=3D 11;
|Boxes (i) :=3D 1;

instead, then I guess, there will be no warning, because at the time
the code is compiled, "i" will *not* be replaced by the constant 11
and the actual value of "i" is probably already out of scope for the
compiler (highly depends on the implementation, I think). Although,
any optimizing stage later probably still only generates a call to the
exception handler if it is smart enough. If it is not, then there must
be a range check here because

|1 <=3D Integer'First or 10 >=3D Integer'Last

results in False.

Of course, my understanding of when a compiler generates a range check
might be completely wrong, I am by no means a compiler writer. :)


Vinzent.

--=20
Parents strongly cautioned  --  this  posting  is  intended for mature
audiences  over  18.  It  may  contain some material that many parents
would not find suitable for children and may include intense violence,
sexual situations, coarse language and suggestive dialogue.