From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,71d1e36fcaaa9b90 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-11 19:07:03 PST From: "Anisimkov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Help with anormal pausing of program Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 08:21:31 +0600 Organization: A poorly-installed InterNetNews site Distribution: world Message-ID: References: <3EE73D2B.4010502@yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p218.maxtnt.dial.omskelecom.ru X-Trace: ns.omskelecom.ru 1055380493 7691 195.162.43.218 (12 Jun 2003 01:14:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ns.omskelecom.ru NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 01:14:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4807.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300 Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!out.nntp.be!propagator2-sterling!news-in.nuthinbutnews.com!news.rosprint.net!radius!not-for-mail Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39020 Date: 2003-06-12T08:21:31+06:00 List-Id: "Jano" wrote in message > Finally some certain facts! You don't know how grateful I feel now. I > was desperate and questioning my most basic understanding of tasking. Glad to help. > Your test program effectively has shown that my PC is affected. > > Now the question :D Is there a solution? I think there is no way to complete workaround hardware error by the any software solutions, so, the best way is to change the computer. > I don't understand clearly from the Microsoft article if a motherboard > driver update can help. I will try that as first attempt. I don't think. > I suppose that my only other alternative is to alter my Gnat (ucks!) Any > hints for that? > > Out of curiosity, is that corrected in Gnat 3.16? It is not GNAT fug, so the GNAT should not be fixed. Maybe somebody could provide GNAT RTL for Win32 not based on the QueryPerformanceCounter ? It would help, but the time precision would be decreased.