From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a0fe76afdfe9e57d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-11 12:01:12 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsmm00.sul.t-online.com!t-online.de!news.t-online.com!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Bruns <newsgroup@donbruno.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: milliseconds and delay until
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 20:58:37 +0200
Organization: T-Online
Message-ID: <bc7u91$t2t$00$1@news.t-online.com>
References: <bc7smt$357$04$1@news.t-online.com>
 <MPG.195197589c4fd46e98971a@News.CIS.DFN.DE>
Reply-To: nospam@donbruno.de
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
X-Trace: news.t-online.com 1055358049 00 29789 FVjXVdpXS3aATR 030611 19:00:49
X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@t-online.de
X-ID: X0xLgvZrgeP0bMWZvVqLbKtAto9y00bPKa5Q7mv0o8qTF8c860YPcv
User-Agent: KNode/0.7.2
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39000
Date: 2003-06-11T20:58:37+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Jano wrote:

> Thomas Bruns dice...
> Why not use better a Time type from start?
> 
> Next : Time := Clock;
> 
> Next := Next + 0.1;
> 
> delay until Next;
mmhhhh... 0.1 is milliseconds :-) but I mean, that the time type + duration
(0.1) is not alright... I test it

Thx
Thomas

-- 
PS:
HW: ASUS P4PE, PIV 2.4 GHz, 768 MB RAM, Geforce 4200, 
SW: Suse 8.2, Kernel 2.4.20, KDE 3.1.2, QT3.1.2, KDEVELOP 2.1.5