From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b30bd69fa8f63cb2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-11 03:12:28 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!213.200.246.247!not-for-mail From: Vinzent Hoefler Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: C bug of the day Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 12:11:00 +0200 Organization: JeLlyFish software Message-ID: References: <1054751321.434656@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <20030611114948.00000bcc._elh_@_terma_._com_> NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.200.246.247 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1055326347 17155949 213.200.246.247 (16 [175126]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38963 Date: 2003-06-11T12:11:00+02:00 List-Id: Erlo Haugen wrote: >No language can be perfect, I guess. What is good for some kind of tasks= might >be bad in other cases. Ada has its strengths and weaknesses (think about= string >handling). I don't think anyone would even think about Ada for embedded >applications in 8 bit MCU's as an example. Well, why not? If there's a compiler available? :-) Vinzent.