From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b30bd69fa8f63cb2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-10 06:41:54 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!213.200.246.247!not-for-mail From: Vinzent Hoefler Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: C bug of the day Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:40:28 +0200 Organization: JeLlyFish software Message-ID: References: <1054751321.434656@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.200.246.247 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1055252513 16206014 213.200.246.247 (16 [175126]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38901 Date: 2003-06-10T15:40:28+02:00 List-Id: kanze@gabi-soft.fr wrote: > I'd rather have a language >in which all of the defaults were fundamentally safe, but with the >freedom to override them if you had special constraints, or even in >cases where you came across a case which the language authors hadn't >considered. I don't know such a language, however; it may exist >somewhere, but if it does, it certainly isn't very popular or wide >spread. And that's been posted to comp.lang.ada? ;-) Vinzent.