From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d472879e3f609e0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-05 09:31:01 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.cesnet.cz!crax.cesnet.cz!news.felk.cvut.cz!not-for-mail
From: "Sergey Koshcheyev" <serko84@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Case sensitivity (was Re: no title)
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 18:28:39 +0200
Organization: Czech Technical University
Message-ID: <bbnr3k$19q$1@ns.felk.cvut.cz>
References: <mailman.0.1054803915.289.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <1054822431.105080@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <SPksVEu3Cybz@eisner.encompasserve.org>
 <slrnbdupj6.88r.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: r2c113.mistral.cz
X-Trace: ns.felk.cvut.cz 1054830516 1338 62.245.66.113 (5 Jun 2003 16:28:36
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ns.felk.cvut.cz
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 16:28:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38694
Date: 2003-06-05T18:28:39+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Preben Randhol" <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote in message
news:slrnbdupj6.88r.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no...
> Larry Kilgallen wrote:
> > In article <1054822431.105080@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>, Hyman Rosen
<hyrosen@mail.com> writes:
> >> Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com wrote:
> >>> case sensitivity has no Pros, just Cons.
> >>
> >> As I said, it's clear to me that case insensitivity
> >> is simply a prejudice of the language designers that
> >> was forced upon all the users.
> >
> > In the same way that case sensitivity was forced on the C* users
> > as a prejudice of the language designers.
>
> Not to forget that C* programmers wants a design where they are free to
> make as many bugs as possible.

Oh, I believe this is called an ad hominem attack. How about some arguments
instead of "whatever"?

Sergey.