From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_SPAM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b30bd69fa8f63cb2 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: fc772,b30bd69fa8f63cb2 X-Google-Attributes: gidfc772,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-04 11:03:06 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!news-out.newsfeeds.com!propagator2-maxim!news-in.spamkiller.net!usc.edu!rpi!not-for-mail From: "Peter van Merkerk" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++.moderated Subject: Re: C bug of the day Date: 4 Jun 2003 14:05:20 -0400 Organization: Turnkiek Technical Systems B.V. Sender: cppmods@netlab.cs.rpi.edu Message-ID: References: <3EDCCE72.4020707@cogeco.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: netlab.cs.rpi.edu X-Original-Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 11:03:11 +0200 X-Submission-Address: c++-submit@netlab.cs.rpi.edu X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.lang.c++.moderated iQBVAwUAPt403EHMCo9UcraBAQEkQAIAjzpVaaW4STBLdIHwJwwwQg8Px5g0cU39 gahSzmzTvWmmGXlT3TTpW/cu8ZmZLAVO1dyx51/OKekxyJKB9cbKBw== =KMRD Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38632 comp.lang.c++.moderated:67745 Date: 2003-06-04T14:05:20-04:00 List-Id: > But your experience only goes to show as I have > always maintained, that C++ is not safe because of the STL. Would you care to explain why "C++ is not safe because of the STL"? -- Peter van Merkerk peter.van.merkerk(at)dse.nl [ Send an empty e-mail to c++-help@netlab.cs.rpi.edu for info ] [ about comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: do this! ]