From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d472879e3f609e0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-03 12:31:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.cesnet.cz!crax.cesnet.cz!news.felk.cvut.cz!not-for-mail
From: "Sergey Koshcheyev" <serko84@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Case sensitivity (was Re: no title)
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 21:16:14 +0200
Organization: Czech Technical University
Message-ID: <bbis5v$16ag$1@ns.felk.cvut.cz>
References: <mailman.8.1054540581.12990.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <slrnbdm1i7.1k5.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <bbf9kl$7kt$1@ns.felk.cvut.cz> <ZXTCa.1089424$F1.129227@sccrnsc04>
 <0vGdnQFmVPoZj0Gj4p2dnA@gbronline.com>
 <gNUCa.41201$fT5.2098@nwrdny01.gnilink.net>
 <slrnbdp2bt.1lk.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <1054647054.761122@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <slrnbdpc43.87p.randhol+abuse@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <1054651042.211055@master.nyc.kbcfp.com>
 <wccznkzjcvc.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: r2c113.mistral.cz
X-Trace: ns.felk.cvut.cz 1054667775 39248 62.245.66.113 (3 Jun 2003 19:16:15
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ns.felk.cvut.cz
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 19:16:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38545
Date: 2003-06-03T21:16:14+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Robert A Duff" <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote in message
news:wccznkzjcvc.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com...
>     function Put(string: String);
>
> would be fine.  Presumably, the "String" after ":" would resolve to the
> type name in Standard, since that's what is expected after ":".  ("The
> type of type is type.")

I'd probably even allow

procedure Put (String : String);

(even though it will sound like too much a heresy :-))

Or are there places where it would be too confusing?

Sergey.