From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8d472879e3f609e0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-06-03 08:17:27 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!213.200.246.247!not-for-mail From: Vinzent Hoefler Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Case sensitivity (was Re: no title) Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 17:16:08 +0200 Organization: JeLlyFish software Message-ID: References: <0vGdnQFmVPoZj0Gj4p2dnA@gbronline.com> <1054647054.761122@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.200.246.247 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1054653446 10032216 213.200.246.247 (16 [175126]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:38499 Date: 2003-06-03T17:16:08+02:00 List-Id: Preben Randhol wrote: >Vinzent Hoefler wrote: >> This would render the "advantages" of case-sensitivity completely >> useless but force the programmers to have a consistent style in all >> places without any style check or pretty printers. :-P > >And the gain is what? s/is/would be/, please. I wouldn't seriously support such an approach. The gain would be forcing a consistent style to the programmer without falling back to a machine-based pretty printer. Call that sadism or so. ;-) Vinzent.