From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6e45fe936511d518
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!q70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Lucretia <lucretia9@lycos.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT - System.ads - System Implementation Parameters
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 00:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: 
 <bbf5f9cf-b603-45a5-a718-adb9e7eb5eee@q70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <74711a57-e7f2-4a11-90bc-865a3fd07d5d@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
	<snatj.226521$MJ6.145834@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.194.162.70
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1203238628 25716 127.0.0.1 (17 Feb 2008 08:57:08
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:57:08 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: q70g2000hsb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=90.194.162.70;
	posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.12)
	Gecko/20080207 Ubuntu/7.10 (gutsy) Firefox/2.0.0.12,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19833
Date: 2008-02-17T00:57:08-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 15, 6:34 am, a...@anon.org (anon) wrote:

> There is no documentation on these Boolean flags because they are use
> by Adacore (GNAT creators) in house. Also some are slowly be removed
> while others are becoming non-operational.

The documentation for these flags is in the targparm.ad[sb] files as
already stated. I don't know if ACT are removing these flags, I can't
see it as they still need them for the Pro versions as well. But, it
wouldn't surprise me, they don't seem to want to let anybody do this
kind of low level work with GNAT and by limiting it to their Pro
variant it would seem that that is the only target that they want
people playing with.

My experience on getting information on either removing the runtime or
limiting it has been nil so far.

Luke.