From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b6e97963d32ee242 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-28 11:23:17 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!uni-duisburg.de!not-for-mail From: Georg Bauhaus Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: The old "Object.Method" syntax debate Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 18:23:16 +0000 (UTC) Organization: GMUGHDU Message-ID: References: <254c16a.0305210726.485125de@posting.google.com> <3ecdd3bf.1149272@news.btclick.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: d2-hrz.uni-duisburg.de X-Trace: a1-hrz.uni-duisburg.de 1054146196 12057 134.91.1.15 (28 May 2003 18:23:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.uni-duisburg.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 18:23:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (HP-UX/B.11.00 (9000/831)) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37930 Date: 2003-05-28T18:23:16+00:00 List-Id: Stephen Leake wrote: :> I think you have, only they are called buffers displayed in a :> window inside a frame in Emacs. And these pop up too, even if :> you hadn't intended to ask for them to pop up ;-) (Yes, that :> can be configured ;-) : : Well, I use Emacs, but I don't use this feature. Maybe I'll give it a : try. (Ehm, I had thought of the windows that will will be added to a frame when it is plausible, like when the window displays a list of compiler messages, and then the windows that will be added because the author of the el-code thaught (let's assume he/she did) it was a good idea to throw some messages at the author.) : :> GNAT does assist when it can produce an index, i.e., can :> compile a unit. : : This is usually my objection; when I'm writing code, by definition it : doesn't compile. So fully accurate completion is not possible. Since Ada supports separate compilation, this is only half true. :-) Georg