From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.236.207.136 with SMTP id n8mr43439092yho.5.1415839713758; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:48:33 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.140.37.83 with SMTP id q77mr79970qgq.7.1415839713709; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:48:33 -0800 (PST) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder01.blueworldhosting.com!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!u7no1209396qaz.1!news-out.google.com!u1ni9qah.0!nntp.google.com!u7no1209393qaz.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:48:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=206.53.78.59; posting-account=ShYTIAoAAABytvcS76ZrG9GdaV-nXYKy NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.53.78.59 References: <87fvdr2vdv.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk> <54609F34.4080201@spam.spam> <35f01472-3510-4f67-8765-006fa8591c35@googlegroups.com> <9tc8w.73007$ZT5.37595@fx07.iad> <22a3816a-4e89-48f0-a126-dce581781beb@googlegroups.com> <084b1934-9641-425e-85ec-293e0334413e@googlegroups.com> <86bf69c8-eb08-4696-b6c9-3784f5c42213@googlegroups.com> <87389olqie.fsf@ixod.org> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What exactly is the licensing situation with GNAT? From: sbelmont700@gmail.com Injection-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 00:48:33 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Received-Bytes: 2388 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1039005622 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:23201 Date: 2014-11-12T16:48:33-08:00 List-Id: On Wednesday, November 12, 2014 5:53:48 PM UTC-5, Randy Brukardt wrote: > > One of the reasons we built Claw was to provide a Windows interface that > would work on any Ada 95 compiler for Windows, not just GNAT. That requires > displine and testing that most hobbyests wouldn't bother with. > > Randy. I was under the impression that any Win32 Ada program was by definition compiler-specific, since there is no standardized way to import stdcall subprograms? -sb