From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,d8a4797a79f9c90f X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-26 08:31:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.vmunix.org!news-FFM2.ecrc.net!news.cesnet.cz!crax.cesnet.cz!news.felk.cvut.cz!not-for-mail From: "Sergey Koshcheyev" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: I/O - exception handling Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 17:26:58 +0200 Organization: Czech Technical University Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: r2c113.mistral.cz X-Trace: ns.felk.cvut.cz 1053962817 5319 62.245.66.113 (26 May 2003 15:26:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ns.felk.cvut.cz NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 15:26:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37792 Date: 2003-05-26T17:26:58+02:00 List-Id: "Jean-Pierre Rosen" wrote in message news:ln9tab.i6j.ln@skymaster... > Doing so will make the exception disappear. You exception handler should rather read: > exception > raise; -- Reraise the original exception, even if you had another exception at close > end Read_Something; Yes, let's just say that I handle the exception appropriately. I'm more concerned with the fact that I have to handle exceptions twice, and close the file in two places, too. Sergey.