From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,3369f7bf5cf89c00
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-03-28 05:18:02 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail
From: scr106@york.ac.uk (Tony)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Does anyone konw the benefit of codesign using ada and vhdl!
Date: 28 Mar 2003 05:18:01 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com/
Message-ID: <bafe238e.0303280518.460760bf@posting.google.com>
References: <bafe238e.0303271156.5d82cf62@posting.google.com>
 <b5vmj0$bk66$1@ID-175126.news.dfncis.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.32.81.24
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1048857481 31442 127.0.0.1 (28 Mar 2003 13:18:01
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 28 Mar 2003 13:18:01 GMT
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:35786
Date: 2003-03-28T13:18:01+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Vinzent Hoefler <ada.rocks@jlfencey.com> wrote in message news:<b5vmj0$bk66$1@ID-175126.news.dfncis.de>...
> scr106@york.ac.uk (Tony) wrote:
> 
> >I mean why we rewrite some vhdl program in Ada?
> 
> Why would you want to do that? VHDL is for chips, Ada is for Software
> running on chips. So the target device is slightly different.
> 
> BTW, I have always seen VHDL as Ada for hardware. ;-)
> 
> 
> Vinzent.

sorry! I mean the codesign work between Ada and VHDL, you can find a
lot of relevant work also in c/verlog.

I am very interested in the ada/vhdl, but don't know how? just as you
said, one is for hardware design and the other is for sofeware design.
How they can codesign a system or others? this puzzled me a lot!

does anyone konw the relevant work about the codesign between
ada/vhdl?

thanks