From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,222ed89632aabb93 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.196.232 with SMTP id ip8mr16293246pbc.6.1341668334313; Sat, 07 Jul 2012 06:38:54 -0700 (PDT) Path: l9ni11086pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Charly Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Free AMD Core Math Library (BLAS/LAPACK) + Ada Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 06:37:35 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <41b74e89-f112-4791-883d-236080652dbf@googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 91.34.37.141 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1341668334 23374 127.0.0.1 (7 Jul 2012 13:38:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2012 13:38:54 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <41b74e89-f112-4791-883d-236080652dbf@googlegroups.com> Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=91.34.37.141; posting-account=5zx--goAAAD06H29EnWQGKTO-gctuXHl User-Agent: G2/1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-07-07T06:37:35-07:00 List-Id: > This is a site for AMD computers for which free and full implementations of BLAS/LAPACK libraries are provided. > > Have anyone tried the above and make it work with Ada? Hello, yes, you can use it (at least on Linux 64 bit), but you need ada bindings. You can find bindings to both lapack and blas on the following addresses: http://www.csee.umbc.edu/~squire/adaclass/lapack-ada/ http://topo.math.u-psud.fr/~sands/Programs/BLAS/ada_blas.tgz For 64 bit OS you MUST use acml-5-1-0-gfortran-64bit.tgz, not acml-5-1-0-gfortran-64bit-int64.tgz because the bindings use int32. Of course it should be able to use the int64 version and make the necessary modifications to the bindings, but I didn't test this. Regards Charly