From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,115bda8caeda5fa4 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.68.20.225 with SMTP id q1mr3100624pbe.22.1315820991335; Mon, 12 Sep 2011 02:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Path: m9ni4574pbd.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Does GNAT support a thread-free RTS? Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 02:49:51 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <4E6C8D7D.2020803@obry.net> <9a41811f-086a-4447-a3c7-6144f68c16b4@et6g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 153.98.68.197 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1315820991 27105 127.0.0.1 (12 Sep 2011 09:49:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 09:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: h7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=153.98.68.197; posting-account=pcLQNgkAAAD9TrXkhkIgiY6-MDtJjIlC User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-Google-Web-Client: true X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESRCNK X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101206 Red Hat/3.6-2.el5 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe) Xref: news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17930 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2011-09-12T02:49:51-07:00 List-Id: I forgot to add that, as Pascal said, ZCX and SJLJ have nothing to do with tasking, so bringing that up in a discussion about FSU vs. native threads as though it had an influence is indeed misleading. My previous post was to clarify the present state of GNAT and the underlying concepts. -- Ludovic Brenta. The group embraces non-linear lessons learned.