From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8 X-Google-Thread: 103376,feca6fc7f3d2dddd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-10 17:27:56 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.stealth.net!intgwpad.nntp.telstra.net!news1.optus.net.au!optus!newshub1.rdc1.nsw.optushome.com.au!news1.rdc1.nsw.optushome.com.au.POSTED!not-for-mail From: raj Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Ada better language also for programming "in the small". Message-ID: References: X-Newsreader: Forte Agent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 00:27:54 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.164.144.2 X-Complaints-To: abuse@optushome.com.au X-Trace: news1.rdc1.nsw.optushome.com.au 994811274 203.164.144.2 (Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:27:54 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:27:54 EST Organization: @Home Network Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9763 Date: 2001-07-11T00:27:54+00:00 List-Id: On Mon, 09 Jul 2001 23:29:02 +0000, Mário Amado Alves wrote: >Actually this might be a non-issue: it has been demonstrated (hopefully my talk at Ada'2001 helped ;-) >that contrarywise to common belief Ada is a >better language also for programming "in the small". But this can also be said about Ocaml, Haskell, Lisp, Eiffel, Erlang, Scheme, etc ... And they do have the advantage of being more buzzword compliant :-)