From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.36.111.139 with SMTP id x133mr9881446itb.11.1507065793301; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 14:23:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.91.81 with SMTP id e17mr135160otj.29.1507065793235; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 14:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!border1.nntp.ams1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer01.ams1!peer.ams1.xlned.com!news.xlned.com!peer02.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!v62no3740630itd.0!news-out.google.com!194ni5834itf.0!nntp.google.com!v62no3735931itd.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 14:23:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=2a02:1205:5055:3750:687c:ec19:b9b:4cc; posting-account=gRqrnQkAAAAC_02ynnhqGk1VRQlve6ZG NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:1205:5055:3750:687c:ec19:b9b:4cc References: <3b98f1ee-dbe3-4f1c-bc9c-5169da819133@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why does Ada compile slower than Python? From: gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 21:23:13 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Received-Body-CRC: 1136333013 X-Received-Bytes: 1566 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:48329 Date: 2017-10-03T14:23:12-07:00 List-Id: > >Probably we are still missing something like Turbo Pascal for that aspect. > > Not really. Janus/Ada has always compiled very fast if optimization is off. Good news! Note that I wrote "probably", not "certainly" ;-) ...