From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,508516c114ade8e1
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Received: by 10.68.241.37 with SMTP id wf5mr211652pbc.4.1328755816663;
        Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:50:16 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 wr5ni3368pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!4g2000pbz.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ada without ada libraries?
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 18:08:21 -0800 (PST)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <ba3906c0-e832-455e-b236-3dd1ad65c79b@4g2000pbz.googlegroups.com>
References: <eecf117d-e86f-45d0-b6ed-50931273e858@h6g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>
 <82mx8tttx7.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <kx86q1tkvfcd$.fmbdm6c01k6i.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.230.151.194
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1328755816 24230 127.0.0.1 (9 Feb 2012 02:50:16
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 02:50:16 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 4g2000pbz.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.230.151.194;
 posting-account=lJ3JNwoAAAAQfH3VV9vttJLkThaxtTfC
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client: true
X-Google-Header-Order: HUALESNKRC
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1;
 rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/9.0.1,gzip(gfe)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-02-08T18:08:21-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Feb 8, 7:07=A0am, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 07:02:12 -0500, Stephen Leake wrote:
> > Patrick <patr...@spellingbeewinnars.org> writes:
>
> >> Would this same approach seem logical for ada? -Patrick
>
> > Yes; "Anything C can do, Ada can do Better"
>
> > Lua should be used for user scripting, not large-scale programming.
>
> There is no scripting which should not be done in Ada. Even if it does no=
t
> appear so at first glance, it is.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Dmitry A. Kazakovhttp://www.dmitry-kazakov.de

HM -- That reminds me, I should re-try implementing a LISP interpreter
in Ada.