From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,103b407e8b68350b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-03 01:24:26 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!postnews1.google.com!not-for-mail From: kcline17@hotmail.com (Kevin Cline) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Anybody in US using ADA ? One silly idea.. Date: 3 Jan 2003 01:24:26 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com/ Message-ID: References: <3E147D79.2070703@cogeco.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.219.89.90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: posting.google.com 1041585866 18438 127.0.0.1 (3 Jan 2003 09:24:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Jan 2003 09:24:26 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:32479 Date: 2003-01-03T09:24:26+00:00 List-Id: Bill Findlay wrote in message news:... > On 2/1/03 17:57, in article 3E147D79.2070703@cogeco.ca, "Warren W. Gay > VE3WWG" wrote: > > > > Maybe what needs to be done is to form a brand new committee, to design > > a spashy new language that basically implements the same features, with > > similar syntax (but not too obviously). Then give it a splashy new name > > after a popular young female (no programmer experience required), and > > call it something like "Shania". > > In a language controversy on comp.arch a few weeks ago, some of us came to > the conclusion that a lot of the irrational antipathy to Ada was based on > unregenerate machismo. Not all the antipathy to Ada is irrational. Most of it comes from sad experience. Mine was trying to use Ada-83 to write Unix applications with a Motif UI. Regardless of any superiority in reliability, the scarcity of libraries and trained programmers makes Ada too expensive for most commercial software projects.