From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,2fa4069595cb9ef7 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!x1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Martin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Breaking a circularity Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 09:28:44 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: <0477ecf8-3ff0-4511-82af-f38587704ca3@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 86.131.250.117 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1301416124 24238 127.0.0.1 (29 Mar 2011 16:28:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2011 16:28:44 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: x1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=86.131.250.117; posting-account=g4n69woAAACHKbpceNrvOhHWViIbdQ9G User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:2.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/4.0,gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:19548 Date: 2011-03-29T09:28:44-07:00 List-Id: On Mar 28, 11:26=A0pm, Gene wrote: > > Better names might help too, why expose that it is a 'wrapper' to the > > user? I'd probably call what I have a '_Wrapper' as 'Event_Queue' and > > then find a better name for the Event_Queues - Event_Queues_With_State > > perhaps. > > > -- Martin- > > Thanks. =A0But the only routine that needs to mention "Wrapper" is the > initializer > for the State. =A0In this case, Wrapper says pretty clearly what's going > on. > Throughout all other code, it's > > State.Future_Events.Queue > > which is pretty clear as well. Yeah, I just meant if you added the extra generic layer, it might be worth a renaming. And between generics and package renames you can always replace horrible names with 'good names' very easily. :-) -- Martin