From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,db9a11afb3da4240
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 102b75,501ec19d1d81daee
X-Google-Attributes: gid102b75,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-03-29 06:49:19 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-out.nuthinbutnews.com!feed-ev1!propagator-sterling!news-in-sterling.newsfeeds.com!newsfeed.onecall.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen
From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Newsgroups: comp.arch,comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Language support for  flexible handling of system-detected
 errors.
Date: 29 Mar 2002 08:49:14 -0600
Organization: LJK Software
Message-ID: <bRcjQXT6c+XG@eisner.encompasserve.org>
References: <j8R78.48$Eh5.268@castor.casema.net>
 <f6013729.0202260913.59286c63@posting.google.com> <
 <jbTm8.94778$702.21482@sccrnsc02> <a7hkfe$bbt$1@pegasus.csx.cam.ac.uk>
 <a7htp0$rh429@news.kvaerner.com> <an6q9uk8bdg8fmbpnhhhhvfqv3ffs043cc@4ax.com>
 <3CA0A166.501E1D68@despammed.com> <name99-2703021910440001@handma2.apple.com>
 <a7vdae$mag$1@nh.pace.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org
X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1017413356 21785 192.135.80.34 (29 Mar 2002
 14:49:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 14:49:16 +0000 (UTC)
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.arch:26096 comp.lang.ada:21836
Date: 2002-03-29T08:49:14-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <a7vdae$mag$1@nh.pace.co.uk>, "Marin David Condic" <dont.bother.mcondic.auntie.spam@[acm.org> writes:
> This is a fair objection and one I have leveled myself from time to time. It
> would be really nice to have a highly integrated IDE - as well as
> significant libraries to speed development with leverage.
> 
> Here's a question that might help the Ada crowd out by getting a critic's
> perspective: If you want a spiffy IDE (and possibly libraries) what would it
> look like? (Its fair to point to some other language IDE and say "Something
> like that...", but it might be more helpful to describe some specific
> features.)

Think Pascal (formerly Lightspeed Pascal ?). It features (featured?)

	incremental recompilation
	debugging

both right from the editor window.