From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,df149c0eae46ddaf,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: "joeprogrammer" <nobody@nowhere.com>
Subject: Freeing pointer to task?
Date: 1999/03/19
Message-ID: <bIC9EGnc#GA.210@newstoo.hiwaay.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 456743660
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-03-19T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Question:

Say you dynamically create a task using the "new" operator, the task runs
and terminates normally.  Should you then use an instantiation of
Unchecked_Deallocation() to free the memory allocated to the pointer to the
task as you would with any other data type?  Or is that not needed with
tasks?

Can not find any details on this topic.  I only know that it is a no-no to
free the pointer as a means of terminating the task.

Thanks,

George