From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2c41845dd8e1b7c4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-12 11:45:04 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!msunews!not-for-mail
From: "Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Problem space (Re: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada
 mandate...))
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 14:40:28 -0400
Organization: Michigan State University
Message-ID: <b9oq3a$7i$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
References: <mailman.39.1052703222.9816.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <u3cjk81gg.fsf@nasa.gov>
NNTP-Posting-Host: arctic.cse.msu.edu
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:37251
Date: 2003-05-12T14:40:28-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Stephen Leake" <Stephe.Leake@nasa.gov> wrote in message
news:u3cjk81gg.fsf@nasa.gov...
> But push it to the extreme, and people will say we should be
> programming in UML, not Ada.

But that is a foolish argument since UML is not well defined.