From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,583275b6950bf4e6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public X-Google-Thread: 11232c,59ec73856b699922 X-Google-Attributes: gid11232c,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-05-09 09:27:04 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news.airnews.net!cabal12.airnews.net!usenet From: "John R. Strohm" Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada,misc.misc Subject: Re: Using Ada for device drivers? (Was: the Ada mandate, and why it collapsed and died) Date: Fri, 9 May 2003 11:09:11 -0500 Organization: Airnews.net! at Internet America Message-ID: References: <9fa75d42.0304230424.10612b1a@posting.google.com> <416273D61ACF7FEF.82C1D1AC17296926.FF0BFD4934A03813@lp.airnews.net> <9fa75d42.0305010621.55e99deb@posting.google.com> <254c16a.0305011035.13133e8d@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305011727.5eae0222@posting.google.com> <17cd177c.0305072114.24f04783@posting.google.com> <9fa75d42.0305090612.261d5a5c@posting.google.com> Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:63403 comp.object:63101 comp.lang.ada:37114 misc.misc:14045 Date: 2003-05-09T11:09:11-05:00 List-Id: X-A-Notice: References line has been trimed due to 512 byte limitation Abuse-Reports-To: abuse at airmail.net to report improper postings NNTP-Proxy-Relay: library1-aux.airnews.net NNTP-Posting-Time: Fri, 09 May 2003 11:24:34 -0500 (CDT) NNTP-Posting-Host: !b]\%1k-W wrote in message news:9fa75d42.0305090612.261d5a5c@posting.google.com... > gautier_niouzes@hotmail.com (Gautier) wrote in message news:<17cd177c.0305072114.24f04783@posting.google.com>... > > softeng3456@netscape.net (soft-eng): > > > > [Ada attributes] > > > > > Yes, Ada extended Pascal very strongly in this regards, > > > without any particular consideration of how useful > > > these extensions would actually turn out to be. > > > > [other Ada attributes] > > > > > Like I said, Ada has amazing amounts of itsy-bitsy stuff. > > > Now which of these features, if missing, would take you > > > more than a minor effort to provide yourself? If and > > > when necessary, rather than present by default all the time? > > > > If I had to reproduce them each time I use them, it would sum > > up to a lot of time... and there are more interesting to do > > in life than reprogramming them. > > Do you really need your own sub-range of integers > very often? Arrays with variable index ranges? > You must do a very different type of programming > from what I do. Let me guess, you're one of these people who believes that only freshmen need subscript range checking, aren't you? You're one of these people who'd rather debug a segmentation fault from a core dump than see a message "Subscript out of range in at ", right?