From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c9d5fc258548b22a X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Subject: Re: How do I write directly to a memory address? Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Reply-To: mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de Organization: cbb software GmbH References: <67063a5b-f588-45ea-bf22-ca4ba0196ee6@l11g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <31c357bd-c8dc-4583-a454-86d9c579e5f4@m13g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <05a3673e-fb97-449c-94ed-1139eb085c32@x1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <8r86vgFc3uU1@mid.individual.net> <19fh1chm74f9.11cws0j5bckze.dlg@40tude.net> <5d9bd120-4953-4fb1-a890-27267245e954@8g2000prt.googlegroups.com> <544076dc-3357-4d8d-bfeb-7ae46a88b931@w19g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <9bt91saw1vao$.9o7azvb4ina6$.dlg@40tude.net> <1aragtrfhwg4w$.1c1eyyf8254pw$.dlg@40tude.net> Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 09:43:45 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Date: 09 Feb 2011 09:43:45 CET NNTP-Posting-Host: 5ce17b84.newsspool4.arcor-online.net X-Trace: DXC=2X@fi_^heoHX36K@\WTHGJ4IUKPiPMkb@ X-Complaints-To: usenet-abuse@arcor.de Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:18047 Date: 2011-02-09T09:43:45+01:00 List-Id: On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 13:48:29 -0800 (PST), Maciej Sobczak wrote: > On Feb 8, 7:14�pm, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" > wrote: > >>> q.e.d. what? >> >> 1. const T /= T >> 2. not (const T <: T) > > That's of course very interesting, but does not relate to the example > that we are discussing. It does, because const T is the type of the actual parameter and T is the type of the formal parameter. >>> Why do you want to substitute one type by another? >> >> Because one is passed as a parameter where another is declared, expected >> and used. This is substitution. > > No. According to the C standard (6.5.2.2/4) this is *assignment*. Making local copies requires copy constructor. That's for sure. But this is unrelated to the substitution, which is always there when you call a subprogram with parameters and/or results. > In Ada assignment looks like this: > > declare > J : constant Integer := 7; > I : Integer; > begin > I := J; -- here > > -- and later, for example: > I := I + 1; > end; > > There is no substitution in the above code, at least as far as my > definitions go. This is assignment. In this example there is no call, except than the assignment operation. Note that the assignment's implied profile is: procedure ":=" (Left : in out Integer; Right : Integer); When J is substituted for Right there is no problem because the anonymous types of "constant T" and "in T" are same in Ada. -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de