From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3ef676faabcff187 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-29 04:50:38 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!62.2.203.231!not-for-mail From: Vinzent Hoefler Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [GNAT] Option for chasing some uninitialized variables ? Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 13:49:51 +0200 Organization: JeLlyFish software Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.2.203.231 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1051617032 11699262 62.2.203.231 (16 [175126]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36727 Date: 2003-04-29T13:49:51+02:00 List-Id: "Gautier direct_replies_not_read" wrote: >> >BTW, is there a way to set one of these pragmata with a command_line >> >switch ? >> >>No, not directly. > >Meanwhile I found an appropriate compiler option: > -gnatec? Specify configuration pragmas file, e.g. -gnatec/x/f.adc Damn. ;-) I should have taken a look into the GNAT User's Guide, not only into the Reference Manual. Vinzent.