From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9ef0b1ff7be6dd43
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-26 08:55:04 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!msunews!not-for-mail
From: "Chad R. Meiners" <crmeiners@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Effect of Gender in Learning Ada - OT
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 11:45:52 -0400
Organization: Michigan State University
Message-ID: <b8e9sk$2s82$1@msunews.cl.msu.edu>
References: <mailman.23.1051336825.13478.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>
 <slrnbakpn5.ht.randhol+news@kiuk0152.chembio.ntnu.no>
 <1b585154.0304260737.154758a4@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: arctic.cse.msu.edu
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36609
Date: 2003-04-26T11:45:52-04:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Peter Richtmyer" <prichtmyer@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1b585154.0304260737.154758a4@posting.google.com...
> I feel silly stating (to me) the obvious, but I get chills when I
> see a statement about "not generalizing" like the above. It seems
> like some PC "knee-jerk" thing to make that disclaimer.
>
> Should I don the asbestos suit?

Probably not.  In my experience the majority of people I know agree with you
about generalizations. ;)