From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8247c32bb1260c74 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-22 09:30:44 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!62.2.203.231!not-for-mail From: Vinzent Hoefler Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Q re pack & aliased Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 18:30:11 +0200 Organization: JeLlyFish software Message-ID: References: <20030420134018.651050df.david@realityrift.com> <3EA56900.70102@crs4.it> NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.2.203.231 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: fu-berlin.de 1051029042 6334198 62.2.203.231 (16 [175126]) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36349 Date: 2003-04-22T18:30:11+02:00 List-Id: Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote: >x86 (with x different from "80" - and maybe also "802") is not all that=20 >byte oriented. Huh? Since when? Of course it might be quite inefficient (even on the 8086) but addresses are still byte[0]-sized on *all* x86. The first True-Color-VGA had 24-bit-sized pixels. How would you have addressed them? [0] In the sense of 1 byte =3D 8 bits. Vinzent. --=20 Parents strongly cautioned -- this posting is intended for mature audiences over 18. It may contain some material that many parents would not find suitable for children and may include intense violence, sexual situations, coarse language and suggestive dialogue.