From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,39f3c359196fe8b4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-04-21 09:29:40 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!feed.news.nacamar.de!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!proxad.net!newsfeed.tpinternet.pl!newsfeed.gazeta.pl!news.onet.pl!not-for-mail
From: "kat-Zygfryd" <6667@wp.pl>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: for x'address or variant
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 18:29:08 +0200
Organization: news.onet.pl
Sender: samael_@op.pl@pc253.konin.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl
Message-ID: <b8169k$66f$1@news.onet.pl>
References: <b7u1jh$p6k$1@news.onet.pl>
 <b7uhb9$4lb72$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <b7ujir$map$1@news.onet.pl>
 <x7v1xzxjg86.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> <b7unl6$4hm$1@news.onet.pl>
 <wccadel9cw7.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <b7v2qr$bto$1@news.onet.pl>
 <52C30E21B2695ADA.9A5568A9039EC23D.34356CD468622AAC@lp.airnews.net>
 <b80h23$s7$1@news.onet.pl> <wccvfx82egs.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pc253.konin.cvx.ppp.tpnet.pl
X-Trace: news.onet.pl 1050942580 6351 217.99.114.253 (21 Apr 2003 16:29:40
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@onet.pl
NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Apr 2003 16:29:40 GMT
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:36331
Date: 2003-04-21T16:29:40+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Robert A Duff" <bobduff@shell01.TheWorld.com> wrote in message
news:wccvfx82egs.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com...
> "kat-Zygfryd" <6667@wp.pl> writes:
>
> Please show us what the C code looks like.
> - Bob

It's LIBAVL 2.0.1 PDF doc, you can find it
and download. However I didn't mean that
those structures where used in this C code,
just that it is correct code (I guess, version
2.0.1 after all).

Zygfryd

PS.
I am deeply unsatisfied because I posted
a question to aquire an answer, not for my
coding style/skills to be discussed, as
some people tend to do.