From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,2153d570c2f03e29 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.66.82.103 with SMTP id h7mr801392pay.11.1355663234259; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 05:07:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.5.174 with SMTP id t14mr3869682igt.11.1355663234021; Sun, 16 Dec 2012 05:07:14 -0800 (PST) Path: s9ni44656pbb.0!nntp.google.com!kr7no5628137pbb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 05:07:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=114.145.11.171; posting-account=Mi71UQoAAACnFhXo1NVxPlurinchtkIj NNTP-Posting-Host: 114.145.11.171 References: User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Question about library-level functions From: ytomino Injection-Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:07:14 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: 2012-12-16T05:07:13-08:00 List-Id: On Sunday, December 16, 2012 7:21:23 PM UTC+9, AdaMagica wrote: > Creating via anonymous access is evil - how can ou ever deallocate it? This should be verboten by the language. I do'nt intent to deallocate it at my code. However, I think, it's able to be deallocated by a named access type as long as these types use same storage pool shown by pragma Default_Storage_Pool.