From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.236.118.171 with SMTP id l31mr1761809yhh.2.1389823816962;
 Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:10:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.182.181.42 with SMTP id dt10mr42115obc.16.1389823816818;
 Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:10:16 -0800 (PST)
Path: 
 border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news.glorb.com!6no12244382qao.1!news-out.google.com!gg4ni4085qab.0!nntp.google.com!6no12244379qao.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 14:10:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <lb6qeq$4ph$1@dont-email.me>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=149.32.224.34;
 posting-account=Qh2kiQoAAADpCLlhT_KTYoGO8dU3n4I6
NNTP-Posting-Host: 149.32.224.34
References: <27ff7582-b2bd-4a51-80a9-6a65a8c3f38b@googlegroups.com>
 <fc12dc98-3702-4081-85a9-f97fa1c5778c@googlegroups.com>
 <74bb1a6c-4239-448b-aa0c-41684cc0fdf5@googlegroups.com>
 <lytxd5uiat.fsf@pushface.org> <lb6qeq$4ph$1@dont-email.me>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b778635f-5416-4a76-b654-1c2e0e544514@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Aspect CPU
From: Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:10:16 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:184437
Date: 2014-01-15T14:10:16-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wednesday, January 15, 2014 12:18:34 PM UTC-8, J-P. Rosen wrote:
> Le 15/01/2014 21:00, Simon Wright a =EF=BF=BDcrit :
>=20
> > Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com> writes:=20
> >> By the way, do you mind to tell which
> >> section of RM showing this declarative syntax.
>  =20
> Yeap, normally the aspect should go after the type definition, but in=20
> the case of a task type, it was felt that it would put them too far=20
> away, at a place where nobody would see it.
=20
It is good to know the rationale behind it. Thank you for pointing it out.

A. Vo