From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,4215feeab2a8154a
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!fdn.fr!gegeweb.org!aioe.org!not-for-mail
From: John McCabe <john@nospam.assen.demon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: C++0x and Threads - a poor relation to Ada's tasking model?
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:59:33 +0100
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID: <b6t5855cc2epg9h3s1qb9ulm96bp3pfphk@4ax.com>
References: <7q2385104kihs87d79p8kfphuoki6r01vq@4ax.com>
 <7961a91c-a5af-40e2-bbc0-6bf69a98176d@z31g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
  <gnc585975lmscgmvat9avedckgs3du6pin@4ax.com>
 <362f621e-a01c-4772-ba02-4e18e9962188@j19g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: RXEkuaSUwmKe0XIGFYSK7A.user.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.7.9
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 2.0/32.652
Cancel-Lock: sha1:dMTQrVPko5TWrnfnwSt6uRZo6ew=
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7702
Date: 2009-08-12T17:59:33+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:56:34 -0700 (PDT), REH <spamjunk@stny.rr.com>
wrote:

>> It seems to me that Ada's model started off with a clean slate and was
>> designed from the ground up whereas with C++ it's always been a case
>> of "how can we bolt this on". That's primarily what I was getting at.

>If the Ada model suits your needs, use it. Why should C++ be
>identical? It serves a different community.

In what way?