From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,c473e498c84938dd X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Orders of Fault Management Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:11:23 +0200 Message-ID: References: <2mnr9kFnpbivU1@uni-berlin.de> <410796AE.2080800@noplace.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de U2HUl1uXuINAa/dOMm9mdAcr5RNsk48WhZAylNmCaAIVqPzH0= User-Agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.12.1 Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2439 Date: 2004-07-28T15:11:23+02:00 List-Id: On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 12:06:13 GMT, Marin David Condic wrote: > Also, a "bug" may not truly stop a software application from > accomplishing its purpose. Which is probably not a bug then. (:-)) > In that case, one might debate the economics > of trying to remove "all bugs". It kind of leads to the question "How > good is 'good enough'?" Perhaps one should better talk about requirements fulfilling... -- Regards, Dmitry A. Kazakov http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de