From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,25457a5aee9eaa04
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,UTF8
Received: by 10.68.234.38 with SMTP id ub6mr5338937pbc.2.1338616152107;
        Fri, 01 Jun 2012 22:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 l9ni10109pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: darkestkhan <darkestkhan@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Fuzzy machine learning framework v1.2
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2012 22:43:10 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <b6f95080-6198-409c-b87a-0487cf6205ae@googlegroups.com>
References: <4fc4fd1c$0$294$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
 <3MDSK83K41059.2087037037@reece.net.au>
 <db0aa54b-9e7c-4a1f-8e68-7b21bb7b37cb@googlegroups.com>
 <op.we83lizjule2fv@douda-yannick>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.59.74.180
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1338616151 22615 127.0.0.1 (2 Jun 2012 05:49:11
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Jun 2012 05:49:11 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <op.we83lizjule2fv@douda-yannick>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=193.59.74.180;
 posting-account=nuF4hQoAAADjc2KKS1rOkzxWWEmaDrvx
User-Agent: G2/1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: 2012-06-01T22:43:10-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Saturday, June 2, 2012 12:57:08 AM UTC, Hibou57 (Yannick Duch=C3=AAne) w=
rote:
> Le Fri, 01 Jun 2012 20:25:50 +0200, darkestkhan <darkestkhan@gmail.com> a=
 =20
> =C3=A9crit:
>=20
> > On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 9:00:32 PM UTC, Kulin wrote:
> >>  [...]
> >> > And please stop with the name-calling. People are not liars simply
> >> > because they don't agree with your definition of what freedom is.
> >>
> >> Freedom is a word that is well-defined. [...]
> >
> > Are you sure about this?
> > define:freedom in google.com seems to disagree:
> > free=E3=83=BBdom
> > Noun
> > 1. The power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without =20
> > hindrance or restraint.
> > 2. Absence of subjection to foreign domination or despotic government.
> >
> > Dictionary.reference.com lists 5 (!) definitions of freedom
> >
> > thefreedictionary.com lists 11 definitions, among them:
> > 3.a) Political independence.
> > 4. Exemption from an unpleasant or onerous condition.
> > 7. Frankness or boldness; lack of modesty or reserve.
> >
> > And as we can see they aren't semantically identical - freedom is not =
=20
> > well defined word, so you can't say that Stallman is twisting the =20
> > meaning of word (especially that one of the synonyms of freedom is...  =
=20
> > license)
>=20
> On the contrary, you gave good reasons to ask Stallman to stop asserting =
=20
> this word belong to him and the GPL, and ask him to acknowledge others ar=
e =20
> not less legitimate to have their own claims on what =E2=80=9Cfree=E2=80=
=9D is.
>=20
> --=20
> =E2=80=9CSyntactic sugar causes cancer of the semi-colons.=E2=80=9D [1]
> =E2=80=9CStructured Programming supports the law of the excluded muddle.=
=E2=80=9D [1]
> [1]: Epigrams on Programming =E2=80=94 Alan J. =E2=80=94 P. Yale Universi=
ty

You mean like here=20
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SoftwareLicenses ?

MIT and BSD are free software licenses according to FSF so I don't see how =
"this word belongs to GPL".