From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.224.64.202 with SMTP id f10mr12901073qai.2.1376069124895;
        Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.49.97.7 with SMTP id dw7mr404312qeb.16.1376069124870; Fri,
 09 Aug 2013 10:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!fx3no1811517qab.0!news-out.google.com!he10ni1155qab.0!nntp.google.com!fx3no1811515qab.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 10:25:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <be702fb4-2657-4fdb-b38e-b689d89ed683@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=213.196.245.158;
 posting-account=nuF4hQoAAADjc2KKS1rOkzxWWEmaDrvx
NNTP-Posting-Host: 213.196.245.158
References: <b29db053-dcf2-4dd4-a4c6-1009705a766d@googlegroups.com>
 <lyehbazwoo.fsf@pushface.org>
 <be702fb4-2657-4fdb-b38e-b689d89ed683@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b6ad0db2-065f-4f0a-9147-3784954de05f@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: doint use debian, use bsd or archlinux
From: darkestkhan <darkestkhan@gmail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 17:25:24 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:16724
Date: 2013-08-09T10:25:24-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Sunday, July 7, 2013 7:55:29 PM UTC, johannes falcone wrote:
> On Saturday, July 6, 2013 11:55:03 PM UTC-7, Simon Wright wrote:
> 
> > johannes falcone writes:
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > > netbsd
> 
> > 
> 
> > > freebsd
> 
> > 
> 
> > > openbsd
> 
> > 
> 
> > > archlinux
> 
> > 
> 
> > >
> 
> > 
> 
> > > all awesome
> 
> > 
> 
> > >
> 
> > 
> 
> > >
> 
> > 
> 
> > > debian is kinda not
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > 
> 
> > and opinion without justification is kinda useless.
> 
> 
> 
> ok here are the reasons
> 
> 1 package manangement
> 
> archlinux cant be beat
> 
> 2 ZFS freebsd has it
> 

Debian has it too :) It is called Debian GNU/kFreeBSD.

> 3 netbsd scheduler outperforms freebsd in mysql transaction benchmarks, and freebsd outperforms linux msot fo the time with exception when you have latest released stable kernel like archlinux
> 
> 4 openbsd is much simpler than rest and very tight n well tested not sloppy as debian, and has best firewall, so for clever programmers openbsd may be best option since simplicity is the most important thing in software
> 
> 
> 
> debain fall behind each of these 4 so give them a try for a few months on a test box, then you will come back and agree
> 
> 
> 
> I have run them all for 6+ years and thus know from experience.

And they all fall behind Debian when it comes to multiarch - which is available only in Debian and derivatives.