From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,cbe0aa3013785791
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: sjw <simon.j.wright@mac.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Minor SPARK problem concerning 'redundant' with clauses.
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:11:56 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <b67cbf34-adb3-4556-90e5-0512457ce0d9@z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <d159ba39-a898-42fb-bb2b-a3b5142893d3@h28g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.20.239.89
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1244664716 25419 127.0.0.1 (10 Jun 2009 20:11:56
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 20:11:56 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: z9g2000yqi.googlegroups.com; posting-host=82.20.239.89;
	posting-account=_RXWmAoAAADQS3ojtLFDmTNJCT0N2R4U
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_7; en-us)
	AppleWebKit/525.28.3 (KHTML,
 like Gecko) Version/3.2.3 Safari/525.28.3,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6419
Date: 2009-06-10T13:11:56-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Jun 10, 8:31=A0pm, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
> I have a package P1 that uses the value of a constant defined in P2.
>
> SPARK requires me to --# inherit P2 and the only place the annotation
> can appear is in the spec of P1. The Ada compiler, however, sees that
> the constant is only referenced in the body and complains loudly that
> the 'with' clause is redundant and might be moved into the body of P2.
>
> Is there a sensible solution to stop the two systems treading on each
> other like this? In most cases, I can hack around the problem with a
> spurious 'use type' clause (as much as I dislike it).

You could explore the options available with -gnatw, perhaps? None
look appropriate at first glance, but ..