From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD,
	FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9b0810d3106d9b8
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!x1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Fun with C
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 13:57:32 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <b5dd3c5c-4567-498b-9a10-691a9fd60fe4@x1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
References: 
 <4b5748dc-60fa-4cec-a317-054626e9a1ca@d19g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 <1908th3tyz101.1f6c5w8t9mggy.dlg@40tude.net>
 <2118e788-7b3e-4d25-8d0f-5e60498e3a3b@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <1hnl95prvrt6i$.1s675gncbjxsu$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <5d44db50-ceff-4f4d-8bc7-714f31fbca06@hd10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
 <1uthrsrabx8di$.8i74uk28axo0.dlg@40tude.net>
 <84b83223-e191-4912-8f73-318deb4dd783@d19g2000prh.googlegroups.com>
 <1j2bi0982bjcs.1beq9xn9za9yb$.dlg@40tude.net>
 <9j18r6hrlf06adfv4rdothhdrjmfdrmeno@4ax.com>
 <1qe52ny88vlk9$.hcf0wgd0xcmh.dlg@40tude.net> <ip1sdn$2dr$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <117x5uepxzqrn$.zu65rz3wdey9.dlg@40tude.net> <ip247q$lt1$1@speranza.aioe.org>
 <10wrcep2z88z3$.1q3jmf2y5a0qn.dlg@40tude.net>
 <356b1c5c-9b6e-488b-a31a-6e1d15082f2c@k22g2000yqh.googlegroups.com>
 <n5tz5oqaynlo$.1u63whw2b1t1u.dlg@40tude.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 83.3.40.82
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1303851452 22580 127.0.0.1 (26 Apr 2011 20:57:32
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:57:32 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: x1g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=83.3.40.82;
 posting-account=bMuEOQoAAACUUr_ghL3RBIi5neBZ5w_S
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US;
 rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101203 Firefox/3.6.13,gzip(gfe)
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19056
Date: 2011-04-26T13:57:32-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Apr 26, 8:18=A0am, "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mail...@dmitry-kazakov.de>
wrote:

> > What? A simple hanging spring can oscillate while being purely linear.
>
> That system is not linear.

Taking into account your further response to Nasser, I take that you
mean the *real* hanging spring.

OK.

But then, I don't see anybody in the whole world who could explain how
it works (the more details, the more shaky it is), not mentioning the
i486 CPU. In which case I no longer understand what you are trying to
prove in this thread.

> What I meant was: take the i486 and describe its [electric] behavior by
> means of Newtonian mechanics. Of course it need not to be a detailed
> description, only a sketch

OK, so welcome back to simplified models. Hanging spring is a linear
system then. :-)

> how it could be done considering that its
> components (electrons etc) are rigid bodies.

It's pointless.

It was not designed at this level of detail (higher-level abstractions
and reusable design modules were used instead), so there is no point
in describing its behaviour at this level.
In which case I again don't understand what you are trying to prove.

--
Maciej Sobczak * http://www.msobczak.com * http://www.inspirel.com