From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 2002:a24:2781:: with SMTP id
 g123-v6mr2548789ita.19.1526612344281;
        Thu, 17 May 2018 19:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5191:: with SMTP id y17-v6mr61151otg.12.1526612344051;
 Thu, 17 May 2018 19:59:04 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!paganini.bofh.team!weretis.net!feeder6.news.weretis.net!feeder.usenetexpress.com!feeder-in1.iad1.usenetexpress.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!v8-v6no1232212itc.0!news-out.google.com!b185-v6ni1448itb.0!nntp.google.com!u74-v6no1214277itb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 19:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8a90d70a-c137-4540-9428-1e200a99b650@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5;
 posting-account=L2-UcQkAAAAfd_BqbeNHs3XeM0jTXloS
NNTP-Posting-Host: 2a02:c7d:3c35:b000:325a:3aff:fe0f:37a5
References: <6420bab2-0aef-4d36-b978-525e4de45e7e@googlegroups.com>
 <aed23075-1271-4e2c-b5f2-8da705e1a73e@googlegroups.com>
 <a86dc533-a8f5-4d1c-9b4c-11d7963c6d15@googlegroups.com>
 <pdkrvk$n53$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
 <1559505943.548291689.457576.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
 <87fu2psqpj.fsf@nightsong.com>
 <8a90d70a-c137-4540-9428-1e200a99b650@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b5a3008e-99be-4ba4-b5c7-f214ebedfb59@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: meaningfully/compellingly "advertising" Ada on StackOverflow
From: Lucretia <laguest9000@googlemail.com>
Injection-Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 02:59:04 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:52418
Date: 2018-05-17T19:59:03-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Friday, 18 May 2018 03:28:50 UTC+1, Dan'l Miller  wrote:

> It would be interesting not only comparing those 2 rows to other correspo=
nding safe or unsafe languages, but also to each other:  Ada-purist versus =
Ada-ecumenical.  He seems to be emphasizing some definition of =E2=80=9Cna=
=C3=AFve=E2=80=9D though.  One or the other of these dual tracks for Ada mi=
ght fly in the face of his definition of =E2=80=9Cna=C3=AFve=E2=80=9D.

Exactly this.

P.S: Well done for keeping it short ;P