From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9dc2c03e552da989 X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.68.190.104 with SMTP id gp8mr21529816pbc.4.1340172147974; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 23:02:27 -0700 (PDT) Path: l9ni71357pbj.0!nntp.google.com!news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!po9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: quiet_lad Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Why Ada isn't as successful as it should be Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 22:23:23 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 173.60.200.180 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1340172147 26608 127.0.0.1 (20 Jun 2012 06:02:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: po9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=173.60.200.180; posting-account=P7XY3woAAADWVZ3Q8yfcXP4_h9XhQ8Kj User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; U; en) Presto/2.10.289 Version/12.00,gzip(gfe) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-06-19T22:23:23-07:00 List-Id: On Jun 18, 11:12=A0am, Adam Beneschan wrote: > Maybe it isn't about the syntax, the verbosity, or the lack of text-handl= ing support: > > http://www.wired.com/wiredenterprise/2012/06/beard-gallery/ > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 -- Adam why should ada be more successful? I heard it handles SMP well, and maybe has something better than regex. Where is the all ada os? where is the all ada database?