From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,c0e0c959f5ef11b4 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Received: by 10.66.77.230 with SMTP id v6mr1364488paw.20.1343031878276; Mon, 23 Jul 2012 01:24:38 -0700 (PDT) Path: p10ni37729134pbh.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ctu-peer!ctu-gate!news.nctu.edu.tw!usenet.stanford.edu!postnews.google.com!x6g2000pbh.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: wrp Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Pre-Ada95 books still worth reading Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 12:46:45 -0700 (PDT) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.170.51.82 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: posting.google.com 1342381605 32169 127.0.0.1 (15 Jul 2012 19:46:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2012 19:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: x6g2000pbh.googlegroups.com; posting-host=75.170.51.82; posting-account=_xNmGgoAAADzVbG1LIrTaXAR97KD43ZC User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/536.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/19.0.1084.46 Safari/536.5,gzip(gfe) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: 2012-07-15T12:46:45-07:00 List-Id: On Jul 15, 4:29=A0am, Simon Wright wrote: > "J-P. Rosen" writes: > > Le 14/07/2012 23:44, Simon Wright a =E9crit : > > AFAIR, Buhr's was not a grapical representation for Ada constructs, but > > for a design method, based on ASM. > > There may be two different books, of course. The one I used to have was > definitely about Ada. You remember right. From what I read online, it seems Bhur started with Buhr. 1984. System design with Ada. in which he introduced his graphical notation. I guess he chose Ada because it was the hip language of the day. Then he refined his system and downplayed Ada in Buhr. 1990. Practical visual techniques in system design: with applications to Ada. and finally dropped Ada in Buhr. 1995. Use Case Maps for Object-Oriented Systems. I thought that since Ada was his working language during development, he might have included features to make his notation more suited to Ada than UML is.