From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Received: by 10.66.90.230 with SMTP id bz6mr13262711pab.40.1430656044846;
 Sun, 03 May 2015 05:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.140.93.226 with SMTP id d89mr168134qge.38.1430656044589;
 Sun, 03 May 2015 05:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!l13no13270222iga.0!news-out.google.com!k20ni1198qgd.0!nntp.google.com!j5no4820618qga.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 05:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <17i2lt32z3ndm.15kiag9ppr3lk.dlg@40tude.net>
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com;
 posting-host=105.237.171.132;
 posting-account=orbgeAkAAADzWCTlruxuX_Ts4lIq8C5J
NNTP-Posting-Host: 105.237.171.132
References: <6f0e4fc5-1487-4051-be4e-f51dfea4ab8b@googlegroups.com>
 <b03e7a34-8afa-4673-bdbe-1b828f0e0a06@googlegroups.com>
 <fa1c4580-81da-486e-8967-3143432df33c@googlegroups.com>
 <mi31hb$bv5$1@dont-email.me>
 <c83fd2d2-172c-4d87-bdb0-3447b458e2bd@googlegroups.com>
 <17i2lt32z3ndm.15kiag9ppr3lk.dlg@40tude.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <b46db0ef-2ff8-4733-92f1-c340b5b9d6d1@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: open source ada binding to zwave
From: jan.de.kruyf@gmail.com
Injection-Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 12:27:24 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref: number.nntp.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:193009
Date: 2015-05-03T05:27:24-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On Saturday, May 2, 2015 at 9:43:01 PM UTC+2, Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> On Sat, 2 May 2015 12:28:47 -0700 (PDT), tonyg wrote:
> 
> > One way might be to use the gnatcoll library and then maybe use python
> > scripts through this library but I think it prefable to have an ada binding.
> 
> Where is a problem? They seem have drivers, use these, if you really need
> to support these devices. It does not look a big deal.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Dmitry A. Kazakov
> http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de

Tony,
if you are comfortable with the library I can certainly make an interface. I was merely bitching about the layout of the library.

You may look here to see how I go about things for myself:

https://github.com/deiKruve/openPowerLink-Ada/tree/master/stm32f-definitions

There is also an open powerlink interface there, but untested. I dropped the openpowerlink idea for reasons discussed previously on this list. 

Perhaps identify some section of the library so we can do a testrun.

Cheers,

j.